Sunday, September 10, 2006

A revelation.

I have wrangled for years with issues of ecclesiology and doctrines, and denominations. And have come to the conclusion I am sick of it all. I am tired of worrying if I am in the right church, or worshipping the right way.

I have come to the Conclusion, that I intend to follow Christ and His Gospel. And I believe that my Church, while not perfect, is the best, and most pure place to do so.

In my Parish (It is an ECUSA Church, but orthodox) We teach Christ Crucified. We Teach basic Christian Morality, we celebrate the Sacraments. And we add nothing to them.

No dogmatism. Christ is the dividing line. There is one dividing line, those who know Christ, and those who need Christ.

When the Sacrament is celebrated, it is made clear that ALL Christians who have proclaimed Christ and been baptized are welcome. You do not need to prove anything. Your word is taken as a dear Brother and sister of Christ.

And the Gospel is the Key.

Are you wrong on the ordination of women? You are still my Brother if you proclaim Christ's Gospel.

Are you wrong on issues of theology? You are still my Brother if you proclaim Christ's Gospel.

No litmus Test, save for the one that Matters. Jesus Christ, the Lord, Savior, God and Messiah of our Lives.

HALLELUJAH AND AMEN!

Friday, September 01, 2006

Since you mentioned Mere Christianity...

One of the things I am always struck by when I read authors such as C.S. Lewis (and Francis Schafer and GK Chesterton) is their clarity of vision. When reading their books you would almost think that they were writing directly to address the issues of our current day.

These men had the forsight to not only recognize the problems of their own day, but to see what those problems would lead to in the future.

In Mere Christianity, one of the things Lewis addresses is that Christianity ultimately MUST be defined as a set of beliefs. I must be creedal in nature. He saw in his own day that people were beginning to define "christian" to mean "good person" or "nice guy" and that this was a danger to the Christian faith.
The problem with defining christianity in those terms is that it then becomes impolite, or even mean to say that someone is not a christian. If you allow "christian" to be defined as "likable" or "nice guy" or "good person" it then becomes a personal insult to say that someone is not a christian.

This, in turn, poses a problem because christianity is constantly under seige by false teachings and deception. If we are going to guard the truth of our faith we must be able to say "this man and what he is teaching are not christian". However we can not say that because we have allowed the word christian to be redefined. Now it has become a personal attack to say something like that. The result is that there is no way to preserve orthodoxy.

Lewis made the point that to say someone is a christian does not mean they are good, nor does it mean they are close to God. It simply means they claim to believe a specific set of doctrines. If a person does not follow in life what they claim to beleive, they are a bad christian. If a person claims to believe something that is not christian, but yet follows good morality, they may be a nice person, they may even be closer to God than someone who is a bad christian... but they are not a christian.

This has become a significant problem in many churches. People who do not believe the core doctrines of the christian faith are permitted to work within the church, to become leaders in the church, and the result is that the church is corrupted, many people are lead astray, and strife and division is propagated in the church

It was for exactly this reason that the early church held councils to protect and establish the core necessary doctrines of christianity.

There is a well known legal technique generally used by defense lawyers to prevent juries from discovering the truth, often referred to as "muddying the waters". The defense will bring up as many alternate theories of who committed the crime, or how the crime could have been committed as possible. The theories don't even have to be very credible, there just has to be alot of them. The result is that the jurors can no longer clearly see the clear facts of the prosecurtion's case. They become bogged down in little details from the flood of varying theories and soon what was once clear as day, is being second guessed and doubted.
Our enemy has taken this tactic against the church. He has flooded the church with varient doctrines and theories and teachings on every issue. The result is that we lose our surity of the truth, we begin to doubt.

This is one of the reasons it is so valuable to go back and read the early writings of the church. The only way to counter a flood of counterfiets is by keeping your eyes on the truth. If you begin to look at the counterfiets, even to discern them... you will soon find yourself in muddy water. If however you keep your gaze focused on the truth, you will recognize anything that doesn't match that standard.

Mere Christianity

C.S. Lewis once wrote a book, a famous book amongst Christians of all stripes, called mere Christianity. And in it, he cut off the fat, and made Christianity simple. The purity of the faith, without denominational spin. I absolutely love that concept.

And it makes me think. That is the goal of Anglicanism. Granted, Anglicanism has not done this perfectly, but it tries.

We cut down Christianity to its core. The basics. The Word, the Sacraments, and the Salvation of sinners.

Tuesday, August 22, 2006

A new Post on Conservative Anglicans.

I wrote a little something on Scripture and Tradition on Conservative Anglicans.

Check it out.

http://conservativeanglicans.blogspot.com

Monday, August 21, 2006

The Holy Scriptures, the Pure and Perfect Tradition

Many Christians get caught up in the relationship between Scripture and Tradition. Some are vehemently against Tradition, in favor of a Bible alone approach. Others emphasize the connection between the two that we find in history. And others Seem to almost place Tradition above Scripture, although they would not admit it.

I am not saying I fully understand the dynamic and complicated relationship between the two. Trust me, greater minds have mulled over this for years and we still don't have a universal consensus. But I have some thoughts. Some thoughts that may or may not lead anywhere, but thoughts nonetheless. This is a somewhat informal journal after all.

Scripture was indeed birthed through the Tradition of the Christian Church. Granted, the Scriptures were inspired by God and are by no means the product of man. But the God did indeed give the Scriptures to us through the Church. The Church was the vehicle by which He conveyed the message of the Holy Writ. The Inspired biblical writers penned it, the Early church used it and affirmed it, and the Church of the Ages has passed it down to us in incredible detail. So when some say that the Scriptures were a product of the Church, they are partially correct.

But we must remember something very important. Yes, the Church was the tool by which the Scriptures were made, but that it is ultimately subject to it. The Scriptures are True, we know this. So anything the Church may say contrary to them, must be regarded as inferior and ultimately untrue.

Thursday, July 06, 2006

Eternal Salvation -Part 2-

I apologize for taking so long to continue on this topic. In any case :) here we go...

I do not believe either the calvinist "perseverence of the saints" or "once saved always saved" (OSAS) to be true. I believe they both contradict the clear teaching of scripture, and since I have rediscovered the historic teachings of the church, I have found that neither of them is supported by the orthodox teachings of the church. (although admitedly there is much more precedent for the Calvinist position, particularly in Thomist theology of medieval scholasticism).


I don't like to use the phrase "lose salvation" as I think it creates a wrong mental image. I don't think salvation is something you misplace like you might your keys, or your sunglasses. However, I do believe the bible clearly teaches that you can reject salvation by rejecting faith in God.

On most issues of doctrie you will find the church splits itself into extreme camps. The opposite extreme of the eternal salvation camp is that section of the church often referred to as legalistic, which tends to teach that if you sin, you will lose your salvation. To hear some you would almost think that you must be re-saved after every time you sin. This is no better than the extremes of eternal salvation. As in so many cases, it is an issue where balance is crucial. We must never give in to condemnation, but we must always be open to conviction.

In order to explain my own views I must begin at the beginning.
In western protestant christianity the fall of man, and the redemption of Christ has been reduced down to a simply transaction of legal justification. Man broke the law and thus earned a death sentence. God had mercy and sent Jesus Christ to take the sentence himself, thus we are free and forgiven. This is true, but it is vastly over simplified, and incomplete. It is not the whole truth.

The over simplification of this view has lead to much of the doctrinal error which is now present in protestant theology regarding redemption and christian living.
First, when adam and eve sinned, they broke no law. There was no law to break. I was always puzzled by this before I rediscovered the historic teaching on this issue. In the bible it clearly says that law did not come until long after Adam and Eve. The first law given at all was in the covenant God made with Noah. The Law of God usually referred to in the bible was not given until Moses. Whats more, the bible clearly says that there was no law prior to this.
This is one of the reasons that Cain was not put to death for murdering his brother.. there was no law by which to condemn him.

Romans 5:13-14 says "13 for sin indeed was in the world before the law was given, but sin is not counted where there is no law. 14 Yet death reigned from Adam to Moses..."

This verse tells us two things, #1 there was no law till Moses. #2 sin existed before law.

If sin existed before law, then sin can not merely be the breaking of a law. The law was given for the express purpose of REVEALING the sin that was already there.

Now, undoubtedly some are thinking "the law was not given, but God's very nature is the law.. so man may not have known the law, but the law existed".
Essentially this is correct, but if you begin to consider the implications of this, you will see that we are moving out of the realm of mere legal issues for sin and redemption.

What Adam and Eve, and all the people till Moses violated was not an external code of laws which existed apart from and outside of God.. but rather the very nature of God himself.

God is utterly and completely holy. Every christian knows this, but do you know what holy means? Holy means sacred, sanctified, set apart. God is totally and completely set apart. What does this mean? What it means is something akin to what we might call "homogeneous". It means essentially that God can not tolerate the presense of anything that is other than himself, or contrary to himself. Only that which is like God can exist within God, or in God's presense.

Now, when we go back to the fact that the actions of Adam and Eve were violations of God's very nature, they, fundamentally rejected God's will and elevated their own will over God. They decided that they would be their own gods. The inevitable result and conclusion is that Adam and Eve (and in them all humanity) were necessarily seperated from God.

In that seperation Adam and Eve died as God had fortold "the day you eat of the fruit of the tree you shall die". Many people question this part of the story because Adam and Eve didn't die physically at that time. They did die immediately in that moment, however. The death spoken of is spiritual in nature. God is the source of life and to be seperated from him is to be seperated from life. So Adam and Eve immediately died when they seperated themselves from God. Their spirits ceased to have life.

The spiritual is the foundation of the physical and the two are irrevocably tied together, thus physical death became inevitable for the spiritually dead as well.

At this point God faced a choice. His presense would utterly destroy Adam and Eve in their state of seperation from him. Were he to inhabit the world the way he had prior to this, it would destroy Adam and Eve. Thus Paul tells us in Roman's chapter 8 that God subjected the entire creation, and everything in it to vanity, corruption, or "emptiness" because it was only through this act that hope remained for the redemption of man. Man's sin soiled the entire creation as well as himself. The result was that God removed himself and set a barrier between himself and the creation and man, so that his holiness would not destroy them.

Everything from that point on in scripture is the story of God revealing himself to man, and showing mankind what sin is, and how to be free from sin.

Sin is not merely the breaking of a law which earns us a punnishment (though it is that), it is that which seperates us from God, that which makes us contrary to God, that which makes us opposed to God.

The ultimate revelation of God came in the form of Jesus Christ, God in flesh. Jesus did so much more for us than merely satisfy the law (though he did that completely). The first profound truth of Jesus Christ is the incarnation. The fact that in Jesus Christ, God became a man. In Jesus Christ God permanently united humanity itself to Himself. This is one of the many reasons that being aware of the dual nature of Christ is so important. Jesus Christ was and is to this day fully God, and fully human. In Jesus Christ humanity has been exalted and sits at the right hand of God the Father.
It is through this union of God and man accomplished in the being of Jesus Christ that we can be redeemed. Our debt to the law must be payed, and it has been, but more than that, we must be restored to communion with God.. we must be restored to life.

Paul always referred to this as the great mystery of the faith, but we in the protestant west have lost sight of the mystery. That in Jesus Christ the life of God was restored to humanity and that we, when were baptized into Jesus Christ were joined with him. We were mysticly made one with him. We joined him in his death, and we join him in the life of God that is in him.

This is not some mere bland forgiving of a debt, it is a mystical communion in which we are literally living in God, and he is literally living in us. It was made possible by the fact that Jesus Christ was both fully man and fully God.

He could pay our debt because he was a man, he could die because he was a man, he could rise again because he was God almighty the source of life itself. He could ransom both us and creation itself back from death and hell because he could die, and because death could not hold him.

So you see that sin is not merely a misdeed which earns you a punnishment. It is an action which is opposed to God himself, it is an act of rebellion against God, it is an act of emnity towards God.
So how does God forgive sin, how do we obtain the life of God?

The answer as I'm sure you all know is faith in Christ Jesus. God uses faith to join us to Christ. When we are in Christ, the old sinful us dies with Christ and is buried with Christ, and we become a new creation, we are born again. This is accomplished in the realm of our spirit. Our spirit is reborn into communion with God. This is how we know God, and know the will of God. As Paul says the natural man does not understand or percieve the things of God, only the spiritual man does.
The story does not end there, however. The issue which caused us to fall in the first place, and the issue which must be overcome in salvation is our will (which is seated in our soul).

In the bible salvation is presented in three tenses, past, present, and future. You have been saved, you are being saved, and you will be saved. These three tenses correspond to the three areas of our being.. the spirit, soul, and body.
when we are baptized into Christ the old spirit dies and is buried with him, and we are made a new creation, a new spirit is born within us from God. This is a moment in time, it happened, we were saved.

The first two aspects of salvation are seen clearly in Titus 3:5 which says

"he saved us, not because of works done by us in righteousness, but according to his own mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewal of the Holy Spirit, "

The washing of regeneration refers to the spirit being born again. Regeneration literally means "born again" it means to be created again. To be generated again. It does not mean an old thing which is fixed, it means a completely new thing, just as "new creation".

The renewing of the Holy Spirit refers to the process of renewing our soul by the working of the Holy Spirit. The word renewing here does not mean the same thing as regeneration. It means to take the old broken thing and fix it, to renovate it. It is an ongoing process of restoring the soul. Paul also refrences this as the renewing of our minds.
Our human will is centered in the soul and even after we are born again in spirit that human will within us desires its own exaltation, and desires to rule us. Thus the challenge of the christian life is wether we will live by the spirit God has given us, or by the soul, by our own will.

Undoubtedly some are thinking that I'm preaching works based salvation (and probably will think so no matter what I say). I am not. The work of rebirth and renewal within us is done entirely by God. However, our will must be involved in this sense.. we must choose wether to submit, or not to submit.
This battle of will is what Paul was referring to when he spoke of the war in his members.. "why do I do what I hate, and why do I not do what I want to do.." The soul must be put down and submitted to the spirit. We can not do this in our own strength, we can only do it through the working of the Holy Spirit in us, BUT we must choose wether to allow it or no.

The teaching of Paul is that as long as we live by the spirit, we do not sin, but when we live by the flesh (and the word Paul uses translated flesh here means soul) we sin.

We all face a war within our members determining wether we ultimately will walk in spirit or in soul. Which will will rule you. God's will revealed through your spirit, or your will manifest in your soul.

Earlier I quoted Titus 3:5, now I quote John chapter 3 which contains a parallel to titus 3:5.

Titus says "he saved us, not because of works done by us in righteousness, but according to his own mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewal of the Holy Spirit, "

John says "Jesus answered, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God."

In order to enter the kingdom of God your spirit must have been reborn through the washing of water and your soul must have been renewed by the work of the Holy Spirit.

You may ask.. how much renewal is enough renewal? doesn't this just turn salvation into a "are you good enough" question?

The answer is no, it doesn't. Proverbs says "a righteous man is he who falls seven times, and seven times gets up..." Its not the falling that makes you rightous.. therefore it must be the getting up.

Even if you have but begun, even taken the first step in the process of renewing your soul it is enough for God. The question is not one of "are you good enough" it is entirely one of "do you have faith".
The problem is that faith CAN NOT be understood as merely mental agreement. If this were the case the devil and all the demons would be saved. Faith must be defined by allegience. It must bear the fruit of action.

It is something of a fine line of understanding we must come to. We must not think that we can earn salvation by deeds... but we must also never think that the fruit we produce, does not matter.

So, we have seen that sin is not merely breaking of a law, earning punnishment, it is that which seperates us from God. It is that which deprives us of life. This is partially, at least, what Paul was talking about when he said "all things are lawful for me, but not all things are expedient". We are no longer under law. Therefore, when you commit a sin you do not earn punnishment. Sin is not counted where there is no law.

BUT... All those who lived from Adam to Moses were also not under law, and thus they were not counted guilty of having broke the law, but they were dead none the less. Even if you are not under law, even if there is no punnishment imputed, sin still brings death.

Thus, when you commit a sin, you do not earn the punnishment perscribed by the law. You do not lose your salvation. You do, however, hinder the life giving presense of God in you and you strengthen your will, your soul, in its exaltation of self against God. When you live by your will, you bring death into yourself, when you submit your will to God, you submerge yourself in Life.

The problem here is that while sin does not cause you immediately to lose your salvation, it may, indeed certainly will if indulged, lead to the hardening of your heart. You will become insensitive to your own reborn spirit, by which you know and understand the things of God, as well as the Holy Spirit and his restoring work.

We often tend to think of "sin" as only the really bad things like drunkeness, lust, drugs, theft, hatred, etc. The real definition of sin is when you follow your own will, above and contrary to the will of God. This 'willfulness' is, at its foundation, rebellion. It opens us to deception, and it, if indulged long enough, may result in our ultimate allegience of faith, transfering from God, to self.

In the next post I will simply look specificly at scriptures which contradict the eternal salvation view points.

Eternal Salvation

One of our readers recently requested that we expound our thoughts and perspectives upon the topic of eternal salvation, aka eternal security, aka once saved, always saved. This seemed to be a good and pertinant topic to me, as in my experience this issue has become more and more prevalent in the church over the last few years. Therefore I proposed to the other members of Conservative Anglicans that we each write our own essay on this topic expressing our views and ideas etc. This is going to be a large topic to cover, therefore I will be breaking my blog into sections to make it more readable.

I must begin the topic by pointing out that there are actually two different theological positions which are often addressed by the term 'eternal salvation'. It will be necessary for me to explain the two positions and the distinctions between them in order for me to give my own view.

One is the Calvinist position expressed in the 5th point of Calvinism's five points (often represented by the anagram TULIP). This fifth point is the "perseverence of the saints".

The idea of perseverence of the saints is the logical extension of the predestination theology taught in Calvinism. In this theology free will, in terms of salvation at least, does not exist. The logical foundation of calvinist thought here is an extreme form of the idea of original sin which in the five point TULIP is the T, Total Depravity. In this teaching mankind is utterly and totally depraved to the point at which it is impossible for any man to do good. Therefore it is impossible for any man to seek God, or to come to God, or to repent. In this condition of depravity it is impossible for man to choose God, thus God must choose man.

Man can only be brought out of the state of depravity by the grace of God. The next step is Unconditional Election. This means that God chooses people completely for his own reasons, (seemingly at random) and for no reason that has anything to do with the man himself. IE it is no merit or goodness on the part of any man that causes God to choose him.

This brings us to the next logical underpinning of the Calvinist doctrine of Eternal salvation "irresistable grace" the I in TULIP. The Calvinist position holds that when God does choose a man, and gives him grace, it is impossible for that man to refuse God or reject grace. Thus the grace of God is "irresistable" no man can resist it.

Eternal salvation then is the logical conclusion of the chain leading from Total depravity, through unconditional election, and irresistable grace. If man can not resist the grace of God, and the man himself played no role in his choosing, and God does not repent of his grace, nor fail in his work (which of course we know he does not from scripture) then the logical conclusion is that the saints of God can not fall from salvation. Thus the saints will catagorically persevere in faith. Anyone who "falls from faith" under this view was never really a saint to begin with but is lumped in under the scripture "if they went out from among us, they were not of us, for if they were of us, they would have remained with us".


The second view point which is sometimes referred to as "Eternal Salvation", but more often is refrenced as "once saved always saved" is not based in Calvinist theology, but is more often arminian in nature. This view point is more difficult to define because it doesn't have the systematic nature of calvinist theology.
However, in general this view point is based on one, or both, of two ideas. The first is that the love of God is so great that once a person has allowed him into their lives, there is nothing they can do which God will allow to seperate them from himself.
The second is that salvation is a matter of the spirit, and once a spirit is born again, it cannot sin. Thus anything a person does is not sin because their spirit is incapable of sinning.

Under this view point, unlike the calvinist view, if a person appears to 'backslide' they have neither lost their salvation, nor were they necessarily a false beleiver, rather they are still saved and still will be with God in eternity, though they may suffer more mischance and problems in this temporal life due to their poor choices.

This view uses verses such as

"there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus",
"For I am sure that neither death nor life, nor angels nor rulers, nor things present nor things to come, nor powers, nor height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord."

and so on to back up their assertion that it is essentially impossible for christians to sin, or at least, their sins no longer matter before God.

-To be Continued-

Wednesday, June 14, 2006

Pray about the General Convention.

The Episcopal Church is now making decisions that will decide the future
of the Anglican Communion. While I am not a member of the AC, but am a
part of the Reformed Episcopal Church, I still pray that they do the
Right thing.

ECUSA needs to repent, or Ecusa will be abandoned by orthodox Anglicans.

Friday, June 02, 2006

The Gospel is not the Reformation of Society but the Salvation of Souls.

It is common in many circles to talk about "The Gospel" as an act of
Social Reform. "Isn't Christianity about Putting others before yourself"
or "Isn't the Gospel about loving each other and God?".

While both of these concepts are very important, and Scriptural, neither
of these are the Gospel.

The Gospel is the Death of Christ in Calvary for the Salvation of our
Souls from a very real destruction. The Martyrs of the early Church did
not die for the teachings of Christ concerning Goodwill and Charity, but
for the belief that He was the Son of God, sent to the Earth to Redeem
Mankind from His Sin, and that He rose from the Dead proving His Victory
over death.

Paul writes in First Corinthians 15:

1Now I make known to you, brethren, the gospel which I preached to you,
which also you received, in which also you stand,

2by which also you are saved, if you hold fast the word which I
preached to you, unless you believed in vain.

3For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received,
that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures,

4and that He was buried, and that He was raised on the third day
according to the Scriptures,

5and that He appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve.

6After that He appeared to more than five hundred brethren at one time,
most of whom remain until now, but some have fallen asleep;

7then He appeared to James, then to all the apostles;

8and last of all, as to one untimely born, ^ He appeared to me also.